ECU vs wideband AF Reading

FlashPro questions & answers specific to the 2010 CR-Z (US, Euro & Asia)
Post Reply
Matt Dex
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 4:05 pm

ECU vs wideband AF Reading

Post by Matt Dex » Sat Dec 24, 2016 5:20 pm

I did datalog and found out that the AF reading was bit lower than the AF from wideband. Which one is more reliable?

User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 8815
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: ECU vs wideband AF Reading

Post by Hondata » Tue Dec 27, 2016 6:04 pm

Where was the wideband sensor placed? Before or after the cat? Has it been free air calibrated?
Hondata

Matt Dex
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 4:05 pm

Re: ECU vs wideband AF Reading

Post by Matt Dex » Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:02 am

It was plugged into the end tip of exhaust during the tuning. From the screen the afr were drawn in a nice smooth line. But when I do the datalog, lambda table show differently (a bit).

Another question is regarding the stock O2 sensors. Os it wideband type or narrowband?

User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 8815
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: ECU vs wideband AF Reading

Post by Hondata » Wed Dec 28, 2016 10:10 am

After the cat will read leaner than the stock o2 sensor. Also if the sensor is near the end of the exhaust then care must be taken to ensure it is not reading any outside air. Finally, the stock o2 sensor is wideband.
Hondata

Matt Dex
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 4:05 pm

Re: ECU vs wideband AF Reading

Post by Matt Dex » Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:12 am

What if my cat was turbocharged and decated. So basically we not really need a wideband meter. We can rely on lambda from ecu.

Post Reply