WOT lambda AFR Table vs. AF Commanded

Civic 2016+ 1.5 Turbo
Post Reply
janemar
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:24 am

WOT lambda AFR Table vs. AF Commanded

Post by janemar »

Hi Hondata Team,

Would like to consult why my AFRCMD is not targeting what I have in the WOT lambda table.

Running on 2.8.6

Attached is the log file and cal.

Thanks!

Image
Attachments
Civic RS +9 Blaze100.final.fpcal
(9.54 KiB) Downloaded 173 times
datalog WOT AFR target issue.fpdl
(60.85 KiB) Downloaded 170 times
Jun43
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2016 2:59 pm

Re: WOT lambda AFR Table vs. AF Commanded

Post by Jun43 »

You need to adjust lean best torque table too
janemar
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2017 4:24 am

Re: WOT lambda AFR Table vs. AF Commanded

Post by janemar »

Thanks Jun!

I'll try that out. :)
User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 10434
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: WOT lambda AFR Table vs. AF Commanded

Post by Hondata »

Please remember that the WOT lambda table is an adjustment, not a target.
Hondata
ukmugenfk7
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:39 pm

Re: WOT lambda AFR Table vs. AF Commanded

Post by ukmugenfk7 »

Hondata wrote: Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:45 am Please remember that the WOT lambda table is an adjustment, not a target.
So with it being an adjustment table does this mean that the value the table is hilighted on needs to be adjusted to compensate for the difference between the AFR and AFRCMD i.e

AFR= 10.5
AFRCMD= 10.87

WOT lambda adjust value + 0.37 to current value

Is this correct?
User avatar
Hondata
Site Admin
Posts: 10434
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: Torrance, CA
Contact:

Re: WOT lambda AFR Table vs. AF Commanded

Post by Hondata »

It depends what the fuel trims are at that point. The AFM table should be altered, not the WOT lambda.
Hondata
ukmugenfk7
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 3:39 pm

Re: WOT lambda AFR Table vs. AF Commanded

Post by ukmugenfk7 »

Hondata wrote: Wed Jan 13, 2021 8:41 am It depends what the fuel trims are at that point. The AFM table should be altered, not the WOT lambda.
Ok so just so i understand correctly,

On WOT pull, AFR is not the same as my AFCMD ( the CMD is calculated from the wot adjustment table in a 4 cell interpolation) so to correct AFR to match CMD i alter the AFM table ( say 3.8v-4.5v)

I then reflash and logg a run.

AFR and AFCMD on the WOT pull match very close so AFM table is now calibrated.

So what reason would i ever need to adjust the WOT lambda table or lean best torque table?

Like you say they are not target tables.
Post Reply