Watching my datalogs, and no matter at what road speed it seems, with only about 25-30% throttle I’m getting about 800 mBar MAP sensor readings and easily going WOT.
Any ideas? Bad sensor or plugged exhaust maybe?
Map sensor vs mBar reading
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 9:23 pm
Map sensor vs mBar reading
2006 FG2, DC Sports SRI, TAYLOR Helix Throttle body spacer
Re: Map sensor vs mBar reading
Post your calibration as well as a datalog showing what you are describing.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 9:23 pm
Re: Map sensor vs mBar reading
ok, attached is the calibration file and a datalog.
im hitting 900mBar @ like 50% throttle.
if you look at the fuel maps the 800+ mBar curves seem really high on some cam angles, compared to the lesser....
Also, what is with the symmetrical dips in the fuel curves within the same cam angle maps??
Thanks for the help.
im hitting 900mBar @ like 50% throttle.
if you look at the fuel maps the 800+ mBar curves seem really high on some cam angles, compared to the lesser....
Also, what is with the symmetrical dips in the fuel curves within the same cam angle maps??
Thanks for the help.
- Attachments
-
- Datalog-210201-002.fpdl
- (417.37 KiB) Downloaded 73 times
-
- Fujita SRI-TEST-NEWEST CAM -NEW IN PROGRESS.fpcal
- (25.33 KiB) Downloaded 69 times
2006 FG2, DC Sports SRI, TAYLOR Helix Throttle body spacer
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 9:23 pm
Re: Map sensor vs mBar reading
so a 900mBar reading at 50% throttle is normal @ 18:06 on the datalog (would be same as 100% throttle...), amongst the other 700mBar and higher readings at 20% throttle?
Also should the big dips in the fuel curves be smoothed out even though it goes against suggested lambda adjustments??
Also should the big dips in the fuel curves be smoothed out even though it goes against suggested lambda adjustments??
2006 FG2, DC Sports SRI, TAYLOR Helix Throttle body spacer